<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 4 Horsemen EA Review And Discussion	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://forexfbi.com/4-horsemen-forex-ea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://forexfbi.com/4-horsemen-forex-ea/</link>
	<description>Forex Bot Investigations - A comparison of the top forex robots and user discussions about optimization, settings strategies and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:07:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Martin		</title>
		<link>https://forexfbi.com/4-horsemen-forex-ea/comment-page-1/#comment-64347</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://forexfbi.com/?p=4108#comment-64347</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I looked into it and the strategy seems to be mean-reverting, which works nicely in higher frequencies on FX. This guy however does basically a simple martingale on it and keeps adding positions if the price is moving in the wrong direction. Then he waits until he&#039;s able to close each position with about zero profit, no matter how long it takes. He sets some generous stoploss, but does not have a reasonable way of dealing with a trending market.
Results in the demo account, with almost perfect statistics therefore seem only as lucky period for his EA. On which he chose to base his sale.
There is a backtest going more into the past attached in his profile and it  is obviously far worse. Still relatively nicely profitable, but I suggest looking at how trading costs really affect the strategy, I have not taken a look at this.
BTW it would be nice if he extended this strategy to other currency pairs, uncorrelated diversification could do it a lot of good.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looked into it and the strategy seems to be mean-reverting, which works nicely in higher frequencies on FX. This guy however does basically a simple martingale on it and keeps adding positions if the price is moving in the wrong direction. Then he waits until he&#8217;s able to close each position with about zero profit, no matter how long it takes. He sets some generous stoploss, but does not have a reasonable way of dealing with a trending market.<br />
Results in the demo account, with almost perfect statistics therefore seem only as lucky period for his EA. On which he chose to base his sale.<br />
There is a backtest going more into the past attached in his profile and it  is obviously far worse. Still relatively nicely profitable, but I suggest looking at how trading costs really affect the strategy, I have not taken a look at this.<br />
BTW it would be nice if he extended this strategy to other currency pairs, uncorrelated diversification could do it a lot of good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
